L4S development hub

Description

Tests run on a 100Mbps bottleneck, with a 20.0ms base RTT.

AQM in use: dualpi2 classic_protection 0%

See the test config file.

Test-1: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-2: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-3: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect1 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect1 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-4: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (10M) and udp-ect0 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (10M), udp-ect0 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-5: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (10M) and udp-ect1 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (10M), udp-ect1 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-6: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (10M) and udp-ect1 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (10M), udp-ect1 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-7: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (10M) and udp-ect0 (10M) and udp-ect1 (10M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (10M), udp-ect0 (10M), udp-ect1 (10M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-8: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-9: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-10: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect1 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect1 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-11: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (20M) and udp-ect0 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (20M), udp-ect0 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-12: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (20M) and udp-ect1 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (20M), udp-ect1 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-13: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (20M) and udp-ect1 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (20M), udp-ect1 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-14: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (20M) and udp-ect0 (20M) and udp-ect1 (20M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (20M), udp-ect0 (20M), udp-ect1 (20M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-15: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-16: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-17: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect1 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect1 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-18: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (50M) and udp-ect0 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (50M), udp-ect0 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-19: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (50M) and udp-ect1 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (50M), udp-ect1 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-20: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (50M) and udp-ect1 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (50M), udp-ect1 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-21: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (50M) and udp-ect0 (50M) and udp-ect1 (50M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (50M), udp-ect0 (50M), udp-ect1 (50M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-22: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-23: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-24: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect1 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect1 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-25: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (75M) and udp-ect0 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (75M), udp-ect0 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-26: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (75M) and udp-ect1 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (75M), udp-ect1 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-27: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (75M) and udp-ect1 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (75M), udp-ect1 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-28: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (75M) and udp-ect0 (75M) and udp-ect1 (75M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (75M), udp-ect0 (75M), udp-ect1 (75M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-29: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-30: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-31: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect1 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect1 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-32: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (100M) and udp-ect0 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (100M), udp-ect0 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-33: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (100M) and udp-ect1 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (100M), udp-ect1 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-34: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp-ect0 (100M) and udp-ect1 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp-ect0 (100M), udp-ect1 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index

Test-35: Prague vs Cubic with a background load of udp (100M) and udp-ect0 (100M) and udp-ect1 (100M)

CCA for flow (1): prague

CCA for flow (2): cubic

Background load: udp (100M), udp-ect0 (100M), udp-ect1 (100M)

Result graph

Go back to index